Legal Opinion
United States v. Matheson
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 8, 1975No. 73 Civ. 2011, 74 Civ. 2437PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KEVIN THOMAS DUFFY, District Judge.
Both the plaintiff, the United States, and the defendant, William L. Matheson as executor of the estate of Dorothy Gould Burns, have moved for summary judgment in the first action by the government to recover an income tax refund of $10,790.99 made to Mrs. Burns’ estate (73 Civ. 2011). Additionally, the government has moved to consolidate a related case (United States v. Matheson, 74 Civ. 2437 (KTD)) in which Mr. Matheson, as executor, has challenged a determination by the Internal Revenue Service that the Burns estate is not entitled to refunds of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Afroyim v. RuskSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Kawakita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Savorgnan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Nishikawa v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Kurz v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. AhmedOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- Vance v. TerrazasSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Worsowicz v. Nashua Corp.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1985
- United States v. Real Property, Buildings, Appurtenances & ImprovementsDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2000
- Laurence J. Terrazas v. Alexander M. Haig, Secretary of StateCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.