Legal Opinion

United States v. Edwin Pierce

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 22, 1977No. 74-1532PublishedCited by 81 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALLACE, Circuit Judge:

Pierce failed to comply with a condition of probation requiring him to reveal certain financial information. Probation was re*738voked and Pierce appeals, contending that the condition was violative of the Fifth Amendment and thus invalid. We affirm.

I

In 1965 the Internal Revenue Service assessed a $248,429.80 wagering excise tax against Pierce. In response, Pierce entered into a scheme to avoid payment. He opened numerous stock brokerage accounts and then bought and sold stock, channeling the payments and receipts through a number of different bank accounts. The result was…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Garrity v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Lefkowitz v. TurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Garner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. United States v. Virginia Consuelo-GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by81 opinions

  1. United States v. Joseph Conforte and Sally ConforteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  2. United States v. Lawrence Antelope, United States of America v. Lawrence AntelopeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  3. United States v. Robert NeffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  4. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  5. Commonwealth v. PikeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API