United States v. Edwin Pierce
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WALLACE, Circuit Judge:
Pierce failed to comply with a condition of probation requiring him to reveal certain financial information. Probation was re*738voked and Pierce appeals, contending that the condition was violative of the Fifth Amendment and thus invalid. We affirm.
I
In 1965 the Internal Revenue Service assessed a $248,429.80 wagering excise tax against Pierce. In response, Pierce entered into a scheme to avoid payment. He opened numerous stock brokerage accounts and then bought and sold stock, channeling the payments and receipts through a number of different bank accounts. The result was…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Garrity v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Lefkowitz v. TurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Garner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. Virginia Consuelo-GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- United States v. Joseph Conforte and Sally ConforteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Lawrence Antelope, United States of America v. Lawrence AntelopeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Robert NeffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Commonwealth v. PikeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.