Legal Opinion

State v. King

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 11, 1994No. 29372-9-IPublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[As amended by order of the Court of Appeals October 11, 1994.]

Becker, J.

Jimmy Lee King appeals his conviction for possession of cocaine pursuant to the Uniform Controlled Substances Act. He claims the trial court erred when it failed to provide the jury with a unanimity instruction under State v. Petrich, 101 Wn.2d 566, 683 P.2d 173 (1984), because the State, while telling the court it would elect one of two possible acts of possession, failed to do so. We agree, and reverse. We also review the trial court’s decision to admit, as a generic "felony”, evidence of King’s 9-year-old prior…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. State v. PetrichWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State v. KitchenWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. People v. CastroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State v. StephensWashington Supreme Court · 1980

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State v. RiversWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. RiversWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. Fiallo-LopezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
  4. State v. HardyWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. HardyWashington Supreme Court · 1997

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API