Legal Opinion

State, Ex Rel. Fulton v. Weinberger

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 23, 1933No. 13032PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcGILL, J.

From this order of the court below, the Superintendent of Banks has prosecuted error proceedings to this court, and the real question involved is, whether or not the court below erred in granting the motion to make definite and certain, filed by the defendants.

Article 13, §3 of the Ohio Constitution which became effective January J, 1913, provides as follows:

“Dues from private corporations shall be secured by such means as may be prescribed by law, but in no case shall any stockholder be individually liable otherwise than for unpaid stock owned by him or her; except that stockholders of…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. BAUMGARDNER Et v. STATE Ex FULTONOhio Court of Appeals · 1934
  2. Ohio Wesleyan Univ. Trustees v. State, Ex Rel.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1934
  3. Squire v. AbbottOhio Court of Appeals · 1937
  4. State of Ohio ex rel. Squire v. PorterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API