Legal Opinion
United States v. 10.48 Acres of Land, and Lowell E. Ash
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 11, 1980No. 78-1630PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FERGUSON, Circuit Judge:
Landowner Lowell Ash appeals from a jury verdict in an action brought by the United States to condemn a flowage easement. Ash argues that he is entitled to a new trial as the trial court improperly sustained the government’s objections to admission into evidence of the price paid by a condemning authority for an easement in a comparable sale. Having concluded that the district court did not abuse its discretion in sustaining the government’s objections, we affirm.
I
The United States filed its complaint in condemnation on December 12, 1974 to acquire a permanent flowage…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. BuescherCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
- Transwestern Pipeline Co. v. O'BrienCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Slattery Company, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
- Clarence Evans and Katherine Evans v. United States of America, Chester Parker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964
- 6816.5 Acres Of Land, More Or Less, In Rio Arriba County, State Of New Mexico; William A. Maddox v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Specht v. JensenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. 68.94 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situate in Kent County, State of Delaware, and Sally A. Dickerson, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- United States v. 0.59 Acres of LandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- EOP-Nicollet Mall, L.L.C. v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.