Legal Opinion
United States v. 68.94 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situate in Kent County, State of Delaware, and Sally A. Dickerson, Trustee
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided October 31, 1990No. 90-3175PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ROSENN, Circuit Judge.
The central issue of this appeal concerns the district court’s exclusion of the testimony of two proposed expert witnesses as well as portions of the landowner’s testimony in a land condemnation proceeding. The United States Government, through its power of eminent domain, took various property interests in parcels of land owned by the appellant Sally Dickerson, Trustee (Dickerson). During a jury trial to determine the value of the condemned property interests, the trial judge refused to allow either of defendant Dickerson’s proposed experts to…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lefteri Poulis and Athena Poulis, His Wife v. State Farm Fire and Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Olson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Salen v. United States Lines Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- In re Japanese Electronic Products Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- In Re Paoli Railroad Yard PCB LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- United States v. 14.38 Acres of Land, More or Less Situated in Leflore County, MississippiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- Genty v. Resolution Trust Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- United States v. HoffeckerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Sylla-Sawdon v. Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.