Legal Opinion

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided August 15, 2002No. 96-119LPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ALLEGRA, Judge.

This inverse condemnation case is before the court following trial in Washington, D.C. Plaintiff seeks just compensation under the Fifth Amendment for the physical taking of a portion of the land that underlain a former trolley line running from the border of the District of Columbia to the Cabin John Bridge in Maryland (the “Cabin John” property). The parties have agreed that some physical taking of the Cabin John occurred when an easement granted in 1964 to the United States to construct the Clara Barton Parkway (the Parkway) over a portion of the trolley line was…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. BFP v. Resolution Trust CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Olson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  5. Preseault v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Childers v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
  2. McCann Holdings, Ltd. v. the United States 0United States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
  3. Arctic King Fisheries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  4. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
  5. Moore v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API