Legal Opinion

Boardman v. Farber

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 9, 1918PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Marshall District Court. — James W. Willett, Judge. The appellee is the assignee of one Bradford, and, under his assignment from Bradford, made claim for alleged services rendered said estate by Bradford. The claim was allowed, and Farber, as administrator de bonis non, appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtSalinger, J.

I. The probate court allowed a claim by appellee, and ordered that the administrator de bonis non pay the claim. The allowance was something like $700, and the order to pay it was made April 13, 1915. The administrator perfected an appeal about October 4, 1915. After the appeal was perfected, and on June 16, 1916, he paid the appellee $471.70, which was then all the money in his hands available for the payment of claims.

*877Before we can consider tbe merits of tbe appeal, we have to face a point made by the appellee that said payment was voluntary, and so constitutes an acquiescence in tbe order…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brumagim v. TillinghastCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
  2. Manning v. PolingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  3. Chambliss v. HassSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  4. Schoonover v. OsborneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  5. Hanschild v. StaffordSupreme Court of Iowa · 1869

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Peoples Trust & Savings Bank v. Security Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
  2. McGovern v. McGovernSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
  3. State Ex Rel. City of Dubuque v. McCloskeySupreme Court of Iowa · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API