Legal Opinion

Chambliss v. Hass

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 27, 1904PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal from Muscadine District Court.— Hon. D. V. Jackson, Judge. The opinion states the case.-

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

Benjamin Chambliss died intestate in the year 1899, and the appellee herein, J. H. Hass, was duly appointed administrator of his estate. Thereafter Jefferson Chambliss, a son of the intestate, brought suit against the administrator, claiming the ownership of certain promissory notes held by- said administrator, and listed as a part of the assets of the estate of Benjamin.Chambliss. Hpon trial, judgment was rendered in favor of the claimant. Within less than one year from the date of said judgment the administrator filed a petition for new trial under the provisions of Code, title 20, chapter…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. The BANK OF THE UNITED STATES v. the Bank of WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  2. Haebler v. . MyersNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  3. Ex Parte RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  4. Cleveland v. TuftsTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Manning v. PolingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Graves v. GravesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  2. Shaw v. AddisonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945
  3. Anderson v. BorderMontana Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Farmers Exchange Bank v. TresterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  5. Coker & Bellamy v. RicheyOregon Supreme Court · 1923

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API