Legal Opinion

Lockney State Bank v. Martin

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 17, 1917No. 1091PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHuff, C. J.

The appellant bank brought suit against Martin upon a negotiable note executed February 1, 1913, by appellee, Martin, due 12 months after date, payable to R. L. Underwood or order, for the sum of $500, with interest thereon at the rate of 8 per cent, from date until paid, and the usual ten per cent, attorney’s fees. This note is indorsed in blank by R. L. Underwood. The appellant bank alleged that it was the holder of the note for value, acquiring the same 'before maturity in due course of trade, without any notice of infirmities in the note.

Martin, by answer, set up that Underwood was the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Seeligson v. Lewis & WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Pope v. HankeIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Sondheim v. GilbertIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Wegner Bros. v. E. J. Biering & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Mathis v. Pridham, ReceiverCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1892

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Washer v. SmyerTexas Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Southern Casualty Co. v. MorganTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
  3. Joy v. GodchauxCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929
  4. Hamilton-Turner Grocery Co. v. HanderTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
  5. Western Nat. Bank v. SpencerTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API