Legal Opinion

Seeligson v. Lewis & Williams

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1885No. Case No. 1811PublishedCited by 64 opinions

Appeal from Harris. Tried below before the Hon. James Masterson.

1Opinion of the Court

Stayton, Associate Justice.

This action was instituted by the appellees to recover the amount of three promissory notes executed to them by the appellant.

The appellant answered by a general denial and by a sworn plea, which was as follows :

“And for farther answer to plaintiffs’ original and first supplemental petitions in the cause filed, this defendant says, that the three notes sued on herein by plaintiffs were not, nor was either of them, executed by the defendant for any consideration, good, valuable or sufficient in law. This defendant avers, that for some time prior to the giving of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Irwin v. WilliarSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Barnard v. BackhausWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Gregory v. WendellMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Boggess v. LillyTexas Supreme Court · 1856
  5. Hooker v. KnabWisconsin Supreme Court · 1870

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Floyd v. PattersonTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Woolsey v. Panhandle Refining Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Morrison v. City of Fort WorthTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Southern Casualty Co. v. MorganTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
  5. Wegner Bros. v. E. J. Biering & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1886

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API