Southern Casualty Co. v. Morgan
Texas Commission of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtNickels, J.
We refer to the opinion of the honorable Court of Civil Appeals (299 S. W. 476) for a complete statement of the case. What is to be said here is by way of supplement of, rather than difference with, expression of the views of that court.
In City of Tyler v. Texas Employers’ Ins. Ass’n, 288 S. W. 409, it was held by the Commission of AppealSj Section B, that While the words of the Workmen’s Compensation Act (Rev. St. 1925, arts. 8306-8309),.taken literally, are broad enough to purport authority for a municipal corporation to become a “subscriber” — i. e., a party — to the scheme of insurance…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Middleton v. Texas Power & Light Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1916
- Floyd v. PattersonTexas Supreme Court · 1888
- Oilmen's Reciprocal Assn. v. FranklinTexas Supreme Court · 1926
- Edwards County v. JenningsTexas Supreme Court · 1896
- Seeligson v. Lewis & WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1885
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Aranda v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 1988
- McCaleb v. Continental Casualty Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1938
- Lewis v. Independent Sch. Dist. of AustinTexas Supreme Court · 1942
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Hendrick Memorial HospitalTexas Commission of Appeals · 1943
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Hendricks Memorial HospitalTexas Supreme Court · 1943
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.