Legal Opinion

Boyajian v. ORDOUBADI

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 20, 2010No. G041311Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SILLS, P. J.

Because bankruptcy law allows for discharges of contingent claims, including claims against the debtor for indemnity before the time the indemnity claim against the debtor can be precisely measured, we affirm the trial court’s judgment precluding the assertion of a prepetition claim for equitable indemnity against the debtor, the respondent and successful defendant at trial, Shahrokh Ordoubadi. The trial court correctly determined that plaintiff’s claim for equitable indemnity was discharged in a bankruptcy proceeding in 1994.

I. THE HISTORY

Like many mystery stories, legal…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Erreca's v. SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN DIEGO CTY.California Court of Appeal · 1993
  3. Colonial Surety Co. v. Uni-Con Floors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
  4. Alcal Roofing & Insulation v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  5. Boston & Maine Corp. v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API