Mugerdichian v. Goudalion

Did plaintiff, on the trial of his action of assump-sit on account annexed, to recover money loaned, by the introduction, in conformity with Revised Statutes, Chapter 96, Section 129, as amended by 1935 Laws, Chapter 138, of his own verifying affidavit, absent objection, with no proof independent, make out a case, which could properly be found to entitle him to a recovery? The answer is Yes.

The account annexed to the writ reads as follows:

“Biddeford, Maine

May 28, 1934

George Goudalion

To: Manoog Mugerdichian, Dr.

To money loaned June 1 —1930 Received on account

$100.00

5.00

Balance $ 95.00”

The…