Legal Opinion

Bramco Electric Corp. v. Shell

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 15, 1976No. 7622DC612PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRITT, Judge.

The determinative question presented by this appeal is whether the trial court erred in rejecting as evidence the purported statement of account designated as Exhibit 1 and the affidavit of Attorney Coleman. We hold that the court did not err.

Plaintiff contends that the admission of the documents in evidence is authorized by G.S. 8-45 which provides as follows:

“Itemized and verified accounts. — In any actions instituted in any court of this State upon an account for goods sold and delivered, for rents, for services rendered, or labor performed, or upon any oral contract for money…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lovell v. Sny Island Levee Drainage DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Brooks v. International Shoe Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
  3. Conner v. HutchinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
  4. Nall v. . KellySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  5. Taylor v. CrouchSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dixie Chemical Corp. v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  2. Santora, McKay & Ranieri v. FranklinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  3. UNIFUND CCR PARTNERS v. DoverCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  4. Durham Life Broadcasting, Inc. v. International Carpet Outlet, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  5. Townes v. Portfolio Recovery Assocs.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API