Spalding Hotel Co. v. Emerson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for St. Louis county, Ensign, J., sustaining the demurrer of defendant Edward P. Emerson and Telza W. Emerson to the complaint on the ground that it does not state a cause of action.
1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.
This was an action brought by the plaintiff against the defendants, wherein it was sought to obtain, as relief against them, a permanent injunction restraining the defendant Silvey from allowing the defendant Emerson to occupy certain rooms in the Spalding Hotel, in the city of Duluth, as a homestead or for any other than hotel purposes, and to restrain the defendant Emerson from occupying the said rooms as a homestead or for any other than hotel purposes. The court below sustained a general .demurrer to that complaint, and plaintiff appeals.
From the complaint it appears that defendant…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gannett v. AlbreeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
- In re Emerson's HomesteadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
- Maddox v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1853
- Frank & Co. v. BrunnemannWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1875
- De Forest v. ByrneNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1856
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Gaston v. GordonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
- Denecke v. Henry F. Miller & SonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
- Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co. v. Seattle Brewing & Malting Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917
- Asling v. McAllister-Fitzgerald Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1926
- Weinkrantz v. Southwestern Life Ins.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.