Legal Opinion

Asling v. McAllister-Fitzgerald Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 6, 1926No. 26,510PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, J.:

This was an action to cancel a lease on a lumber yard. The lessor’s grievance was that the lessee put the premises to no use, and because of want of use and occupancy the property was deteriorating, and insurance could .not be obtained. A demurrer to the plaintiff lessor’s petition was sustained and he appeals. The contract of lease, in part, recited:

*456“This indenture, Made this 8th day of September, a. d. 1921, . . .
“Witnesseth, That the said party of the first part, in consideration of the rents and covenants herein specified, does hereby…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. BostwickSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Taylor v. FinniganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  3. Alford v. DennisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  4. Chamberlain v. BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  5. Snehoda v. First National Bank in WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ingannamorte v. Kings Super Markets, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
  2. Eberhardt Lumber Co. v. LecuyerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941
  3. Borgen v. WiglesworthSupreme Court of Kansas · 1962
  4. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc. v. Bynum Bynum v. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1951
  5. Stevens v. Mobil Oil Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API