Stewart v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
CHARLES E. ORTH, Jr., Judge,
Specially Assigned.
I
We have cautioned bench and bar on numerous occasions that the Maryland Rules of Procedure
are not guides to the practice of law but precise rubrics “established to promote the orderly and efficient adminis tration of justice and [that they] are to be read and followed.”
Isen v. Phoenix Assurance Co., 259 Md. 564, 570, 270 A.2d 476 (1970), quoting Brown v. Fraley, 222 Md. 480, 483, 161 A.2d 128 (1960). We reminded in Noble v. State, 293 Md. 549, 557, 446 A.2d 844 (1982) that
[t]his Court has firmly adhered to the principle that the rules of…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Dorsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
- Rogers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- Hunt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Desmond v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1994
- Winder v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Denicolis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- Miles v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Nicolas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.