Legal Opinion

Franklin v. Chas. C. Schulman Co.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided December 29, 1942No. 22PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOOD, Associate Judge.

Two assignments of error in this case require our attention. Appellant assigns as error the action of the trial court in denying appellant’s motion to strike the statement of proceedings and evidence. The facts in this regard, as disclosed by the record and conceded by counsel during the argument, are that after noting an appeal appellant’s counsel prepared and presented to the trial judge on October 3, 1942 a statement of proceedings and evidence and served a copy thereof upon appellee’s attorney; that on October 8, 1942 appellee filed objections to the statement of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Langnes v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Fairmount Glass Works v. Cub Fork Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. Freid v. McGrathCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
  4. Cornwell v. CornwellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
  5. Atlantic Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. KeeseeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Conrad v. MedinaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1946
  2. Imhoff v. WalkerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1947
  3. Shlopak v. DavisonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943
  4. Edmonston v. StanleyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1950
  5. Peay v. ParksDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1945

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API