Legal Opinion

Markus v. Brohl

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided October 23, 2014No. Court of Appeals No. 13CA1656PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by JUDGE DAILEY

*650¶ 1 A conservation easement (CE) "is a permanent restriction that runs with the land for the purpose of protecting and preserving the land in a predominantly natural, scenic, or open condition." Kowalchik v. Brohl, 2012 COA 25, ¶ 2, 277 P.3d 885 ; see also §§ 38-30.5-101 to-111, C.R.S.2014 (establishing the purposes and requirements for conservation easements).

¶ 2 In Colorado, a taxpayer may claim a state income tax credit, all or part of which is transferable to third parties and which may be carried forward for up to twenty years, in connection with a donation of a…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. State v. NietoSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  4. Mt. Emmons Mining Co. v. Town of Crested ButteSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  5. People v. RockwellSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. MedvedSupreme Court of Colorado · 2019
  2. Medved v. StateColorado Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. Creager Mercantile Co. v. Colo. Dep't of RevenueColorado Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. Medved v. StateColorado Court of Appeals · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API