Markus v. Brohl
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by JUDGE DAILEY
*650¶ 1 A conservation easement (CE) "is a permanent restriction that runs with the land for the purpose of protecting and preserving the land in a predominantly natural, scenic, or open condition." Kowalchik v. Brohl, 2012 COA 25, ¶ 2, 277 P.3d 885 ; see also §§ 38-30.5-101 to-111, C.R.S.2014 (establishing the purposes and requirements for conservation easements).
¶ 2 In Colorado, a taxpayer may claim a state income tax credit, all or part of which is transferable to third parties and which may be carried forward for up to twenty years, in connection with a donation of a…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- State v. NietoSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
- Mt. Emmons Mining Co. v. Town of Crested ButteSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- People v. RockwellSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. MedvedSupreme Court of Colorado · 2019
- Medved v. StateColorado Court of Appeals · 2016
- Creager Mercantile Co. v. Colo. Dep't of RevenueColorado Court of Appeals · 2015
- Medved v. StateColorado Court of Appeals · 2016