Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Fink v. City of Cincinnati
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided February 26, 2010No. 2009 CA 37PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Froelich, Judge.
{¶ 1} This matter is before the court on the direct appeal of defendant-appellant Airborne Express, Inc. (“ABX”) from a trial court judgment concluding that plaintiff-appellee, Danielle Bates, was entitled to receive unemployment benefits because she had not been terminated for just cause. For the following reasons, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
I
{¶ 2} Bates began working as a customer-service agent for ABX on February 14, 2005. On July 28, 2006, Bates injured her back while working. She filed a claim with the Bureau of Workers’ Compensation, which was allowed…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Irvine v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1985
- Tzangas, Plakas & Mannos v. AdministratorOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Silkert v. Ohio Department of Job & Family ServicesOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
- Clark Cty. Bd. of Mental Retard. v. Griffin, 2006-Ca-32 (4-6-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- Giles v. F P American, Unpublished Decision (9-16-2005)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Niskala v. Ohio Dept. of Job & Family Servs.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2011