Legal Opinion

Miller v. Steinfeld

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 13, 1916PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiff, Rhoda N. Miller, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the defendants, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Saratoga on the 5th day of February, 1915, upon the verdict of a jury, and also from an order entered in said clerk’s office on the 15th day of February, 1915, denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial made upon the minutes.

1Opinion of the Court

Lyon, J.:

The plaintiff was seriously injured by falling from a stepladder. ' It was of a construction commonly known as a stepladder chair, and bore the words, “Trade Mark, Steinfeld.” Two pieces of wood joined together by a hinge at each end formed the seat, permitting the back portion of the chair to be turned over on the front portion, creating a form of stepladder in common use. The defendants were dealers in toys and furniture specialties on Broadway in the city of New York. The chair was undoubtedly one of a half dozen bought of the *339defendants by Bickley Brothers who conducted a house…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Elgin National Watch Co. v. Illinois Watch Case Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
  3. Koehler v. . SandersNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  4. Willson v. . Faxon, Williams FaxonNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
  5. Marceau v. Rutland Railroad Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kirk v. Stineway Drug Store Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1963
  2. Stasiukiewicz v. Marcus Contracting Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API