Legal Opinion

Commissioner of Labor v. Wall

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 30, 2002No. AC 21148PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LANDAU, J.

The defendants, Mary Lou Wall and Suburban Homes & Condos, Ltd. (Suburban), appeal from the judgment of the trial court awarding $10,633.36 in withheld wages and penalties to five former employees1 of the defendants and awarding $7500 in attorney’s fees to the plaintiff commissioner of labor.2 On appeal, the *452defendants claim that the court improperly (1) held that the parties had not agreed to a policy authorizing up to a 50 percent “back charge” reduction in commissions earned by the claimants, (2) held that two of the individual claimants were entitled to withheld…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co. v. WalshSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  2. Butler ex rel. Skidmore v. Hartford Technical Institute, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  3. L & R Realty v. Connecticut National BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  4. Pitt v. KentSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
  5. In re Michaela Lee R.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Saunders v. FirtelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  2. Commissioner of Labor v. WallSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  3. Saunders v. FirtelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API