Saunders v. Firtel
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
978 A.2d 487 (2009)
293 Conn. 515
Barry SAUNDERS et al.
v.
Burton FIRTEL et al.
Barry Saunders
v.
Burton Firtel et al.
Barbur Associates, LLC
v.
Adco Medical Supplies, Inc.
No. 18309.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Argued April 21, 2009.
Decided September 22, 2009.
Arnold M. Potash, Seymour, for the appellants (defendant Burton Firtel et al.).
Jonathan S. Bowman, with whom was Rachel A. Pencu, Bridgeport, for the appellees (plaintiff Barry Saunders et al.).
ROGERS, C.J., and NORCOTT, VERTEFEUILLE, ZARELLA and McLACHLAN, Js.
ZARELLA, J.
This appeal[1] arises out of three separate actions[2] initiated by the…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Screws v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Dubay v. IrishSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Schoonmaker v. Lawrence Brunoli, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- State v. SalmonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- CFM of Connecticut, Inc. v. ChowdhurySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.