Legal Opinion

Youngstown Metropolitan Housing Authority v. Evatt

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 1944No. 29645 and 29646PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

The question to be determined is whether the decisions of the Board of Tax Appeals are unreasonable or unlawful.

Appellant claims that for the year 1939 the land was exempt under the provisions of' Section 5351, General Code; that for the years 1940, 1941 and 1942 the land ■and buildings constituting the project were exempt under the provisions of Sections 5351 and 5353, General Code; and also that the property was exempt, under the provisions of the federal Constitution and ■.statutes.

Por the purposes of our decision we shall presume that the authority was created legally and that it acted in…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Block v. HirshSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. United States v. Gettysburg Electric Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Matter of N.Y. City H. Authority v. MullerNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  4. Wells v. Housing Authority of the City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  5. Hogue v. the Housing Auth. of North Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. City of Cleveland v. Board of Tax AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 1950
  2. In Re Bond Hill-Roselawn Hebrew SchoolOhio Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Anderson/Maltbie Partnership v. LevinOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Akron Home Medical Services, Inc. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  5. A. Schulman, Inc. v. LevinOhio Supreme Court · 2007

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API