State v. Morse
Missouri Court of Appeals
.Appeal from the Audrain Circuit Court. — Hon. E. M. Hughes, Judge. (1) The information is sufficient under section .4329, Revised Statutes, 1889. State v. Ramsey, 52 Mo. App. ■668; State v. Webb, 47 Mo. App. 599. (2) The information is sufficient and charges an offense under either section 3592 or 3593, Revised Statutes, 1889. This information follows the language of the statute of the .first section cited and is, therefore, good.
Read the full summary
.Appeal from the Audrain Circuit Court. — Hon. E. M. Hughes, Judge. (1) The information is sufficient under section .4329, Revised Statutes, 1889. State v. Ramsey, 52 Mo. App. ■668; State v. Webb, 47 Mo. App. 599. (2) The information is sufficient and charges an offense under either section 3592 or 3593, Revised Statutes, 1889. This information follows the language of the statute of the .first section cited and is, therefore, good. State v. Tissing, 74 Mo. 72; State v. Anderson, 81 Mo. 78. Where the exact words of the statute are not used and words of equivalent import are used, this is…
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, P. J.
One Thomas R. Harper filed a complaint before the justice alleging that the defendant “did maliciously, wrongfully and unlawfully cut his. wire fences” on his farm in a certain section, township and range. At a day subsequently the prosecuting attorney filed with„the justice an information charging-that the defendant did unlawfully, willfully and mali*334ciously cut down, break and injure a portion of a wire fence, being the property belonging to one Thomas R. Harper which enclosed the farm and crops of the said Thomas R. Harper and situated in certain section, township and range, in which the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. RansbergerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
- State v. WareSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
- State v. WatsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1877
- State v. WestMissouri Court of Appeals · 1886
- State v. CoyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1891
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Mott Store Co. v. St. Louis & San Francisco RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1914
- Mott Store Co. v. St. Louis & San Francisco RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1913
- State v. GrubbMissouri Court of Appeals · 1897
- State v. ThayerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1900