Legal Opinion

State v. Thayer

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 30, 1900Published

Appeal from Jackson Criminal Court. — Hon. Jno. W. Wofford, Judge.

1DissentSherwood, J.

([dissenting.) — From the conclusion announced in the majority opinion I dissent. The Attorney-General has filed an admirable brief in this cause, in which he collected'a great array of authorities, everyone announcing in terms or in effect, the principle that as an appeal is purely a right and a creature of the statute, that no such right or creature exists unless it be affirmatively granted by the statute which creates it.

None of these authorities, though directly in point, have been cited, noticed or discussed in the majority opinion. It is sometimes easier to ignore a long array of…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited105 opinions

  1. Ex Parte McCardleSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. McKane v. DurstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Missouri v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  4. United States v. SangesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  5. Ex Parte KearneySupreme Court of the United States · 1822

100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API