State v. Coy
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from the Buchanan Circuit Court. — Hon. Silas Woodson, Judge.' The court erred in overruling the motion to quash the information, for the reason that it charged no offense against the laws of the state. The motion to quash goes to all parts of said information. State v. Meek, 70 Mo. 355; State v. Shiflett, 20 Mo. 415; Brut-ton v. State, 4 ■ Ind. 601, 602; Lemon v. State, 4 Ind. 603; United States v. Nelson, 29 Fed.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the Buchanan Circuit Court. — Hon. Silas Woodson, Judge.' The court erred in overruling the motion to quash the information, for the reason that it charged no offense against the laws of the state. The motion to quash goes to all parts of said information. State v. Meek, 70 Mo. 355; State v. Shiflett, 20 Mo. 415; Brut-ton v. State, 4 ■ Ind. 601, 602; Lemon v. State, 4 Ind. 603; United States v. Nelson, 29 Fed. Rep. 202; Kline v. State, 44 Miss. 317. Otherwise no offense is charged. State v. O ’ Brien, 74 Mo. 549 ; State v. Crenshaw, 41 Mo. App. 24. A petition in trespass founded…
1Opinion of the CourtEllison, J.
Defendant was prosecuted and convicted on an information charging that he “did then and there unlawfully and wilfully and maliciously and wantonly, and without right, injure by tearing down a certain board fence inclosing part of lot 8 in block .56 in Patee’s addition to the city of St. Joseph, and more particularly the inclosure on the north side •of said lot, the same being the property of Mrs. Eliza A. Powers, in which the said defendant had no interest, ■contrary to the form of the statute in such case made and provided, and against the peace and dignity of the state.”
It is difficult to…
2Cited by1 opinion
- State v. MorseMissouri Court of Appeals · 1893