Fox Typewriter Co v. Corona Typewriter Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Appeal and Cross-Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Michigan. Suit by the Corona Typewriter Company against the Fox Ti>pewriter Company. Judgment granting plaintiff partial relief, and both parties appeal.
1Opinion of the Court
DENISON, Circuit Judge.
This was the usual infringement suit, brought in the court below by the Corona Company against the Eox Company, based upon 8 different patents for typewriters, combining the standard keyboard and type-bar construction, with the capacity for folding into small space, so as to be easily packed and carried. Under the 8 patents, 46 claims were specified and relied upon. Of these 27 were held valid and infringed; 12 valid, but not infringed; and 7 invalid. Both parties appealed, affecting 7 patents and 35 claims. The patents now involved are the following:
Rose, reissue…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Miller v. Eagle Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Palmer Pneumatic Tire Co. v. LozierCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1898
- American Automotoneer Co. v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1916
- Otis Elevator Co. v. Portland Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1903
- Standard Typewriter Co. v. Standard Folding Typewriter Sales Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1910
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In re RogoffCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
- Dillon Pulley Co. v. McEachranCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1934
- Portman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929
- Standard Brands v. Federal Yeast CorporationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1930
- Schenk v. United Aircraft CorporationDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1941
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.