Iske v. Stockwell-Kling Corp.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON (IRA F.), J.
Respondent has moved to dismiss the appeal in this case upon the ground that the notice of appeal was not filed within the time required by law. The record shows that notice of intention to move for a new trial was filed on May 27, 1932, there having been no notice of entry of judgment theretofore served upon appellant. Subsequently, and on May 31, 1932, respondent served upon appellant a notice of entry of judgment. A motion for a new trial was made and a denial thereof was entered on July 27, 1932, and a notice of appeal was filed on August 26, 1932.
The parties agree…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lawson v. GuildCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Payne v. HuntCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Knight v. PaultonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bunton v. Arizona Pacific TanklinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Kocher v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.California Court of Appeal · 1934
- Rubens v. WhittemoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Rainey v. CrowderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Bunton v. Arizona Pacific TanklinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.