Legal Opinion

Knight v. Paulton

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 8, 1932No. Docket No. 7461PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.

The defendant executed and delivered to the plaintiff his promissory note dated November 2, 1922, made payable ninety days after date. There is ample evidence to sustain the court’s finding that the note remains wholly unpaid. By defendant’s answer to the complaint he denied the alleged fact of nonpayment, and asserted that the entire amount had been paid. Defendant further set forth that on March 19, 1923, defendant settled the entire obligation of the said promissory note and received a receipt in full satisfaction therefor from the plaintiff. Said receipt was introduced in evidence and was…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bureau of Welfare, California Teachers' Ass'n v. DrapeauCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  2. Oliver v. BoxleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. Iske v. Stockwell-Kling Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API