Legal Opinion

Riverside Water Co. v. Gage

California Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1891No. 13426PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from, a judgment of the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBeatty, C. J.

— The plaintiff, a California corporation organized for the purpose of appropriating, owning, selling, and distributing water for the irrigation of lands, and for domestic and other purposes, brings this suit to determine the adverse claim of the defendant to a portion of the waters of the Santa Ana River, and for an injunction restraining the defendant from diverting water in excess of his right.

The findings and decree of the superior court were in favor of the plaintiff, and the defendant appeals from the judgment, claiming that the findings do not correspond with the allegations of the…

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. Miller & Lux Inc. v. Enter. Canal & Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Duckworth v. Watsonville Water & Light Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Riverside Water Co. v. GageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Arizona Department of Water ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  5. San Luis Water Co. v. EstradaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API