Scott v. Twelfth Court of Appeals
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PHILLIPS, Chief Justice.
This is an original mandamus proceeding. The parties in the underlying action dispute whether defendant’s investigations of the accident are privileged from discovery because made in anticipation of litigation. The trial court ordered discovery of the investigations, but the court of appeals granted mandamus relief reversing that order. Earnest Scott, the party seeking discovery, asks us to reinstate the trial court’s ruling. We conditionally grant the writ of mandamus.
Scott was injured at work on April 3, 1989, when a load of wood fell on the forklift he was…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Johnson v. Fourth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1985
- Loftin v. MartinTexas Supreme Court · 1989
- Flores v. Fourth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1989
3Cited by12 opinions
- In Re Union Pacific Resources Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2000
- Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. v. Thirteenth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- In Re Houston Lighting & Power Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
- In Re WoodTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. Thirteenth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.