Legal Opinion

Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. v. Thirteenth Court of Appeals

Texas Supreme Court

Decided September 19, 1996No. 96-0521PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

In this original proceeding, the court of appeals conditionally granted mandamus directing the trial court to vacate its order transferring venue from Hidalgo County to Dallas County. The court of appeals held that the trial court abused its discretion in transferring venue after refusing to grant a second motion for continuance to complete reasonable discovery on venue. 925 S.W.2d 119. Because we conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion, we conditionally grant mandamus.

David Crockett Woods and Sandra Kay Woods sued Bridgestones/Firestone, Inc. and five other…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Union Carbide Corp. v. MoyeTexas Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Montalvo v. Fourth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Scott v. Twelfth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Woods v. Alvarez, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1996

4Cited by29 opinions

  1. In Re Team Rocket, L.P.Texas Supreme Court · 2008
  2. In Re Missouri Pacific Railroad Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
  3. In Re BledsoeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2001
  4. In Re Perritt, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1998
  5. Masonite Corp. v. Garcia, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1997

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API