Legal Opinion

In Re Union Pacific Resources Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 2000No. 99-0704PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Per curiam

The issue in this original mandamus proceeding is whether the district court abused its discretion by partially sustaining relator’s objections to discovery based on relevance when relator did not adduce evidence in support of its objections. Contrary to the court of appeals, we hold that the district court did not abuse its discretion.

Union Pacific Resources Company sued its excess insurer, Continental Insurance Company, for defense costs and payments made on liability claims covered, Union Pacific asserts, by Continental’s policy. The claims related to a Corpus Christi petroleum refinery…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Peeples v. Honorable Fourth Supreme Judicial DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Weisel Enterprises, Inc. v. CurryTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Ford Motor Co. v. LeggatTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  5. In Re Continental Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. in Re National Lloyds Insurance Company, Wardlaw Claims Service, Inc. and Ideal Adjusting, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2017
  2. In Re Allstate County Mutual Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2007
  3. In Re Exmark Manufacturing Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2009
  4. In Re Enron Corp. SecuritiesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2009
  5. in Re Commitment of Michael Elbert Young, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2013

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API