Legal Opinion

Neale v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 2005No. 01S02-0408-CR-350PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SULLIVAN, Justice.

Defendant Robert L. Neale seeks our review and revision of his 50-year sen*636tence imposed for child molesting. The principal reason the trial court increased the sentence beyond the standard 30-year sentence for this crime was Neale’s prior criminal history. We conclude that his criminal history, which consists entirely of misdemeanor convictions, does not justify a 20-year increase in his sentence and revise his sentence to 40 years. '

Background

Robert L. Neale lived with a woman and her daughter, M.S. During the fall of 2000, Neale had sexual intercourse with then 12-year-old…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wooley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Buchanan v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Fointno v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Francis v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Ruiz v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Cardwell v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Childress v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Rutherford v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Cotto v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Hope v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API