Neale v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SULLIVAN, Justice.
Defendant Robert L. Neale seeks our review and revision of his 50-year sen*636tence imposed for child molesting. The principal reason the trial court increased the sentence beyond the standard 30-year sentence for this crime was Neale’s prior criminal history. We conclude that his criminal history, which consists entirely of misdemeanor convictions, does not justify a 20-year increase in his sentence and revise his sentence to 40 years. '
Background
Robert L. Neale lived with a woman and her daughter, M.S. During the fall of 2000, Neale had sexual intercourse with then 12-year-old…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Wooley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
- Buchanan v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
- Fointno v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1986
- Francis v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
- Ruiz v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Cardwell v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
- Childress v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
- Rutherford v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- Cotto v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
- Hope v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.