Legal Opinion
Brayton v. City of New Brighton
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided July 26, 1994No. C0-94-252PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
Appellant DeAnna Brayton commenced this litigation seeking declaratory and injunc-tive relief against respondent City of New Brighton (the City), asserting that a city ordinance regulating the content and placement of signs-was unconstitutional. On the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment, the trial court ruled in favor 'of the City. We affirm.
FACTS
The material facts of this ease are not in dispute. In March of 1991, appellant placed two signs in the front yard of her home in New Brighton. One of the signs, which was approximately 2 feet by 4 feet in size,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for VincentSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Clark v. Community for Creative Non-ViolenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Metromedia, Inc. v. City of San DiegoSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Simon & Schuster, Inc. v. Members of the New York State Crime Victims BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- City of Painesville Building Department v. Dworken & Bernstein Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2000
- Granite State Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. City of ClearwaterDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2002
- Advantage Media, L.L.C. v. City of HopkinsDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2005
- Painesville Bldg. Dept. v. Dworken & Bernstein Co., L.P.A.Ohio Supreme Court · 2000