Legal Opinion
Karr v. Baldwin
District Court, N.D. Texas
Decided March 11, 1932No. 3363-618PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ATWELL, District Judge. ■
The complainant, joined by her husband, alleges that the defendants, Baldwin, justice of the peace, William MeCraw, as district attorney, James Allred, as state Attorney General, and R.'B. Gragg, as state commissioner of labor, are seeking and threatening to enforce against her the-provisions of an Act of the 38th Legislature of the state of Texas (chapter 41), relating to> employment agents, and that such a state law is invalid and unconstitutional, in that its pi’ovisions and requirements, when asserted against the plaintiff, are in violation of the Fourteenth…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Truax v. CorriganSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Connolly v. Union Sewer Pipe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Terrace v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Smith v. CahoonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Culver v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
- Anderson v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1946
- Andrews v. Montgomery Ward & Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1939
- Cooley v. State Board of Funeral Directors & EmbalmersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- National Foundation v. City of Fort WorthDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.