Burch v. Holliday
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.
1. Where the provisions of sections 2032-2035, inclusive, of the Civil Code (1910), relating to the impounding of animals found going at large on the premises of any person other than their owner, have become operative by an election and compliance with the conditions in sections 2036 et seq., so .that the premises are in a “stock law” county or district, a possessory rwarr rant will not lie to recover cattle lawfully impounded under Jhese *238statutes. Dew v. Smith, 130 Ga. 564 (4), 569 (61 S. E. 232); King v. Ford, 70 Ga. 628; Smith v. Whelchel, 11 Ga. App. 45 (74 S. E. 573); Goodwill v.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sheriff v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Mathewson v. Brigman Motors Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1919
- Bush & Brother v. RawlinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
- Susong v. McKennaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Dew v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- McCants v. UnderwoodCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1944