People v. Arnold
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. Frank II. Dunne, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.
The defendant is the husband of Dessie Arnold, whose conviction of the crime of grand larceny, under an indictment in which she was jointly charged with this defendant, one Emma Smith and one E. C. Miles, has heretofore been sustained by this court. (See People v. Arnold, 17 Cal. App. 68, [118 Pac. 729].) The appeal now before this court, however, is from a conviction of the crime of grand larceny, under an indictment in which all of the same parties are jointly charged, but is for a different larceny than that of which Dessie Arnold was convicted though perpetrated by similar methods.
Appellan…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. WhalenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- People v. ArnoldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
- People v. MilesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- People v. EvanoffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- People v. FawverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- People v. HutchingsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- State v. CottrillCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.