Legal Opinion

People v. Hutchings

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 11, 1922No. Crim. No. 799PublishedCited by 5 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.

Defendants, by indictment of the grand jury, were charged with the larceny of fifty thousand dollars from one Norris. Trainor and Patterson were never apprehended, but Hutchings was tried and convicted. He appeals from the judgment of conviction.

The larceny charged against appellant and his eo-eonspirators was accomplished through trick and device, by means of a fake stock transaction through a fake stock broker’s office. [1] Appellant contends that the evidence fails to support the verdict of guilty, because of the alleged insufficiency of certain testimony introduced for the purpose of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. People v. HarringtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
  2. State v. HydeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1911
  3. Commonwealth v. RobinsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  4. People v. PerezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
  5. People v. WhitemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. RabeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. In Re De VoeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  3. People v. WoodsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  4. People v. ChesterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. People v. ChoateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API