Legal Opinion

Miller v. Luckey

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 13, 1909PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Action of trespass. Before Judge Spence. Mitchell superior court. February 22, 1908.

1Opinion of the CourtHolden, J.

1. The defendant in error, Luckey, brought suit against Miller & Larrimore as a copartnership, and against the individual members thereof, for damages alleged to have resulted from acts of trespass claimed to have been committed by the defendants in cutting and boxing, for turpentine purposes, certain trees on the lands of the plaintiff. Upon the trial of the case, a general verdict was rendered in favor of the plaintiff, and the defendants made a motion for a new trial, which was overruled. To the order of the court overruling the motion for a new trial the defendant Miller alone excepted;…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Western & Atlantic Railroad v. TateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  2. Armour & Co. v. Ross & BarfieldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  3. Foote & Davies Co. v. MalonySupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  4. Smith v. Eubanks & HillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884
  5. McCrary v. PritchardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Central Georgia Power Co. v. CornwellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  2. Bitting v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  3. Southern Cotton Oil Co. v. OverbySupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
  4. Brown v. AndersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  5. Spooner v. SpoonerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API