Legal Opinion
Armour & Co. v. Ross & Barfield
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided April 6, 1900PublishedCited by 29 opinions
Action on contract. Before Judge Nottingham. City court of Macon. August 8, 1899.
1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.
Ross & Barfield brought an action by attachment against Armour & Co., of Chicago, Ill., for the recovery of damages resulting from the alleged breach of contract by the defendants, which contract was set forth in the petition in the following language:
“ Memorandum of agreement made and entered into this 28th day of June, A. D. 1898, between Armour & Co., of the City of Chicago, County of Cook, State of Illinois, party of the first part, and Ross & Barfield, of the County and State aforesaid [Bibb County, Georgia], party of the second part, witnesseth: The party of the second part hereby…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Merritt v. BagwellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
- Stovall v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. ShotterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884
- Augusta Railway Co. v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
- Central Railroad & Banking Co. v. SkellieSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. FordhamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- Howell v. AyersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- Tift v. Wight & Weslosky Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1901
- Piedmont Life Insurance Co. v. BellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- Bass Dry Goods Co. v. Roberts Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.