Legal Opinion

Bass v. Taylor

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1936No. 6314PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Cureton

The Court of Civil Appeals in its opinion, affirming the judgment of the trial court (50 S. W. (2d) 853), has made a statement of this case sufficient for the purposes of this opinion, and we shall not attempt a complete statement of the facts and issues. We do append hereto, however, a reproduction of a portion of the map which accompanies the record. The map is entirely too large for us to reproduce as a whole, but that part which we do attach is sufficient for a proper conception of the facts which gave rise to the legal questions here involved.

The locus of the controversy is in the valley…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fort Worth Improvement District No. 1 v. City of Fort WorthTexas Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Bunch v. ThomasTexas Supreme Court · 1932
  3. St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. CraigoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1895
  4. Bass v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. City of Austin v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  2. Coleman v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  3. Red Lake Fishing & Hunting Club v. BurlesonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
  4. Stoner v. City of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  5. In Re Adjudication of Water Rights of the Lower Guadalupe River Segment, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API