Legal Opinion
Arcade County Water District v. Arcade Fire District
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 31, 1970No. Civ. 12080PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BRAY, J. *
Plaintiffs appeal from judgment in seven actions consolidated for trial and appeal, denying them charges for furnishing water to defendant fire districts’ fire hydrants.
Question Presented
Are the fire districts liable for water charges in implied or quasi-contract after express rejection of liability?
Record
Plaintiffs are two county water districts organized under the County Water District Law (Wat. Code, § 30000 et seq.). The five defendants are fire districts organized under the Fire Protection District Law of 1961 (Health & Saf. Code, § 13801 et seq.). Plaintiff Arcade sued…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Desny v. WilderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Coachella Valley County Water District v. StevensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- City of Oakland v. E. K. Wood Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1930
- People Ex Rel. City of Downey v. Downey County Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Glenbrook Development Co. v. City of BreaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Trent Meredith, Inc. v. City of OxnardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- People v. MasonAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 2016
- People v. Arredondo, California Court of Appeal, 6th District2016
- Wilde v. City of DunsmuirCalifornia Supreme Court · 2020
- Bock v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.