Legal Opinion
Coachella Valley County Water District v. Stevens
California Supreme Court
Decided January 31, 1929No. Docket No. L.A. 8676PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment of dismissal following an order sustaining a demurrer to the complaint without leave to amend.
The action was brought to restrain the* defendant, Stevens, from preventing, obstructing or impeding the natural flow of the Whitewater River in Riverside County, except as the same may be necessary for reasonable uses and purposes on the lands of said defendant.
It appears from the allegations of the complaint that the plaintiff is, and since January 16, 1918, has been, a county water district duly organized and existing under the provisions of an act called in these…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Robinson v. KerriganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Miller v. Bay Cities Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
- In Re WernerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Islais Creek Reclamation District v. All PersonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
3Cited by24 opinions
- Citizens for Open Access to Sand and Tide, Inc. v. Seadrift Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Jordan v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Rank v. KrugDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1950
- Eduardo P. TRUJILLO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.