Legal Opinion
Victor Wickersham and Jessie B. Wickersham v. T. D. Harris
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 23, 1963No. 7044PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRATTON, Circuit Judge.
The purpose of this action was to recover compensation for services rendered in connection with the effectuation of a contract executed in the District of Columbia for the sale of land in Virginia belonging to defendants. One defense was that plaintiff acted without having a license as a real estate broker or salesman and therefore could not recover. The case was tried to the court without a jury and judgment was entered for plaintiff.
The evidence relating to the crucial facts is burdened with very few material differences or conflicts. Plaintiff resided in the District…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Massie v. DudleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1939
- Freeman v. JerginsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Shaffer v. BeinhornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Alford v. RaschiatoreSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Grammer v. Skagit Valley Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Colegio International Sek Puerto Rico, Inc. v. EscribáSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1994
- Rees v. Department of Real EstateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Harrison v. J. H. Marshall & Associates, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1970
- RDP Development Corp. v. SchwartzDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- LCS Homes, Inc. v. Driggs Building Systems, Inc. (In Re LCS Homes, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.