Legal Opinion

Southern Lines Linen Supply Co. v. City of Corbin

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided March 25, 1938PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Morris, Commissioner

Beversing.

The question involved is the validity of an ordinance of the City of Corbin, of date November' 3, 1936. Omitting inconsequential parts, it reads as follows:

“All persons, partnerships, firms or corporations, * * * engaged in collecting, distributing, furnishing, leasing or exchanging for hire, replacing any and all materials or goods of every description or kind, cotton, woolen, linen, dry-cleaning, or washed fabrics, for soiled or used materials and exchanging same in the City of Corbin, shall pay to the city * * * an annual tax in the sum…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Fiscal Court Owen Co. v. F. & A. Cox Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
  2. Williams v. City of Bowling GreenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  3. Richmond Linen Supply Co. v. City of LynchburgSupreme Court of Virginia · 1933
  4. City of Louisville v. PooleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
  5. Martin, Comr. of Revenue v. Nocero Ice Cream Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ace Tire Co., Inc. v. Municipal Officers of WatervilleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
  2. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Kentucky Tax CommissionCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
  3. City of Louisville v. KoehlerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1954
  4. Peel v. Dummit, Atty. Gen.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1948
  5. Southern Linen Supply Co. v. City of HazardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API