Legal Opinion
Williams v. City of Bowling Green
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
Decided April 24, 1934PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Judge Clay
Affirming.
By an ordinance approved February 18, 1931, tbe common council of the city of Bowling Green amended section 213, subsection .53, of the 1929 Bowling Green City Code, so as to read as follows:
'“To operate a. cleaning and dyeing plant, or; either, of clothes and other materials, $25.00.
“To engage m or solicit the business of cleaning and dyeing, or either, of clothes or other materials without the operation of a plant in the city, $200.00.”
W. M. Williams brought this suit to enjoin the enforcement of the ordinance on the ground that it is…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Rast v. Van Deman & Lewis Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- State Bd. of Tax Commr's of Ind. v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- American Sugar Refining Co. v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Quong Wing v. KirkendallSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- W. W. Cargill Co. v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Nichols v. HenryCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1945
- McLeod, Comm. of Rev. v. Santa Fe Trail Trans. Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
- Kentucky Milk Marketing & Anti-Monopoly Commission v. Borden Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1970
- Reynolds Metal Co. v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
- Second Street Properties, Inc. v. Fiscal Court of Jefferson CountyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1969
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.