Legal Opinion

Lentz v. . Lentz

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 7, 1927PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Cubiam.

This Court rendered the opinion that the original judgment in this action was a consent judgment. Lentz v. Lentz, 193. N. C., p. 742.

The question presented: Is it error for the court below to hold that the defendant is not guilty of contempt in failing to pay the monthly installments due on a consent judgment? We think not.

In Coburn V. Comrs., 191 N. C., at p. 74, it is said: “This consent judgment left a discretionary power in the court to make such orders or decrees for the protection of the rights of all parties.”

There is no provision in the judgment in the present action that…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Holden v. HoldenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  2. Wilson v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  3. Turner v. . TurnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  4. Turner v. TurnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  5. Cox v. Albemarle Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API